By Ventura Breeze Staff –
A Ventura Superior Court judge has upheld the decision to permanently close portions of Main Street to vehicles in downtown Ventura, reversing an earlier order that sought to reopen the area. Judge Matthew P. Guasco issued a tentative decision on January 8, 2025, in response to a lawsuit filed by local property owners who opposed the closure.
The judge concluded that the City of Ventura’s decision to permanently close Main Street was justified and supported by evidence, including public surveys and staff recommendations. According to Judge Guasco, the closure was deemed beneficial for the community, as it allowed for improved traffic flow and public enjoyment of Main Street and its businesses. The court further found that the city did not exceed its legal authority or act arbitrarily in making the decision.
The closure began in spring 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic, when sections of Main Street from Fir Street to Figueroa Plaza, as well as California Street from Main Street to Santa Clara Street, were closed to vehicular traffic. This was part of an effort to help businesses expand their operations outdoors in response to public health guidelines. The closure allowed for safer, socially distanced environments for both businesses and residents.
Although originally intended as a temporary measure, the closure was extended several times through special permits, lasting for nearly three years. Property owners under the name “Open Main Street” filed a lawsuit in March 2024, seeking to reopen the street, arguing that the closure had harmed local businesses. However, the court ruled in favor of the city, affirming the decision to keep the street closed.
In addition to vehicles, the closure also affects bicycles, e-bikes, and skateboards. The Ventura City Council voted unanimously on May 21, 2024, to make the closure permanent. The judge’s ruling finalizes the decision, further solidifying the city’s vision for a pedestrian- friendly Main Street.
The ruling is seen as a victory for pro ponents of the closure, who argue that it has contributed to a safer, more vibrant downtown area, while opponents believe it limits access and hinders business activity.
